Friday, May 8, 2020

Naturalized Epistemology Essays - 1621 Words

Epistemology can be divided into two parts: one being traditional epistemology and the other being naturalized epistemology. The difference between the two is that traditionalists simply accept what they think they know whereas naturalists put what they think they know to empirical tests. When I say empirical, I mean methodologies of the natural science. In other words meaning putting things we think we know to practical tests to find out if it is true, scientifically. Or to even better understand what I mean by empirical, it is essentially another way of saying naturalized epistemology. In this essay I will establish the reasons why naturalized epistemology is a better choice over traditional epistemology. Firstly I will establish how†¦show more content†¦The problem with this is that theoretical paradigms have no common basis; hence, paradigm-shifts cannot work out. Special Relativity and Newtonian Mechanics may seem to have the same theoretical term meaning but they donâ €™t because the terms of ‘mass’, ‘force’, and ‘duration’ all have a different meaning to different scientists. Science in Kuhn’s opinion and from what we gather on theoretical paradigms does not provide a concrete empirical assumption on epistemology. It does not work best empirically because matters dealing with science must happen with theoretical paradigms, whose effectiveness is an issue. As I have mentioned, epistemology done empirically is better known as naturalized epistemology. However, traditional epistemology, otherwise seen as normative, can help us understand philosophy. When I say normative, I mean the matters of rationality and justification. Jaegwon Kim describes this form of normative epistemology in his essay, What is ‘Naturalized Epistemology’? where he comments, â€Å"that justification is a central concept of our epistemological tradition, that justification, as it is understood in this tradition, i s a normative normative concept, and in consequence that epistemology itself is a normative inquiry whose principal aim is a systematic study of the conditions of justified belief.† (Kim 539) Epistemology can be seen as a normative discipline as we see with rationality and the concept of Davidson’s claim onShow MoreRelatedThe Pursuit Of Truth By Willard Van Orman Quine1326 Words   |  6 Pageswhich is then regarded as greater than the sum of its parts. Quine then ends his firster chapter with the talk of empirical content and norms and aims. Quine, in the section of norms and aims, discusses the relationship between naturalized epistemology and traditional epistemology. Quine’s next chapter is about reference. In the first section, Quine talks about bodies. Quine says, â€Å"This is where I see bodies materializing, ontologically speaking: as ideal nodes at the foci of intersecting observationRead MoreEpistemology Is A Better Choice Over Traditional Epistemology1479 Words   |  6 PagesEpistemology can be split into two areas: one being traditional epistemology and the other being naturalized epistemology. The distinction between the two forms of epistemology is that traditional epistemologists accept what they think they know whereas natural epistemologists put what they think they know to empirical tests. The connotation of ‘empirical’ in this context refers to the methodologies of natural science; specifically, putting theories that we believe to know to scientific experimentationRead MoreUnderstanding The World Through The Study Of Knowledge1862 Words   |  8 Pagesthoroughly known as Epistemology, is the realm of philos ophy that studies the sources, nature, limitations, and rationality of knowledge. The most incisive expression of disapproval of naturalistic approaches to epistemology is that they are incapable of effectively dealing with standards and inquiries of justification. Epistemology without such norms, is supposed to be an endeavor not worth achieving. (Stroud,Alemder). What one induces of this is depends on whether epistemology is worth doing at allRead More Evidential Basis in Epistemic Justification Essay5302 Words   |  22 PagesSignificance and Priority of Evidential Basis in Epistemic Justification ABSTRACT:There are various approaches to epistemology as well as to the philosophy of science. The attempt to naturalize them is the newest approach. In the naturalistic framework, epistemology turns out to be identical with the philosophy of science. The main characteristic of both naturalized epistemology and naturalized philosophy of science is their methodological monism. Therefore, both of these meta-level areas of philosophyRead MoreOrganizational Epistemology2939 Words   |  12 PagesRunning Head: ORGANIZATIONAL EPISTEMOLOGY    1   Organizational Epistemology St. Rachel E. Ustanny University of Phoenix ORGANIZATIONAL EPISTEMOLOGY    2   There are different perspectives about the origin of knowledge, which have influenced the development of concepts such as a priori and a posteriori truth, epistemic regress, and sensual perception—Descartes (as cited in Cooper, 1999) argued that there are certain undeniable truths, which are obtained from our senses; Feldman (2003)Read More Haraway’s A Cyborg Manifesto Essay1097 Words   |  5 PagesDonna J. Haraway’s A Cyborg Manifesto Haraway’s provocative proposal of envisioning the cyborg as a myth of political identity embodies the search for a code of displacement of the hierarchical dualisms of naturalized identities (CM, 175), and thus for the breakdown of the logic of phallogocentrism and of the unity of the Western idealized self. Haraway defines the cyborg as a cybernetic organism, a hybrid of machine and organism, a creature of social reality as well as a creature ofRead More The Adversarial System Essay2229 Words   |  9 PagesBibliography Paul Roberts Adrian Zuckerman. Criminal Evidence.2ed.(2010) Oxford University Press Erica Beecher – Monis, The Epistemology of Prediction; 60, Washington and Lec Law Review. 353 (2003 Ronald J Allen Brian R Leiter. Naturalized Epistemology the Law of Evidence.2001.Virgina Law Review Ronald J Allen Brian R Leiter. Naturalized Epistemology the Law of Evidence.2001 Dale Nance, Review of Foundation of Evidence Law by Alex Stein, Publication Review, Legal Theory.2007 Read MoreWomen s Impact On Women1305 Words   |  6 PagesBlack folks have known dehumanization as a part of their medicalization. Their bodies were used to create the discourse around race. They were measured and then marked as other or deviant juxtaposed the white, male medical model. In 1695, Race is naturalized through scientific research and becomes hierarchical. Negroids were classified last -- as subhuman. Yet their bodies were used as some of the first studies of the human condition. For example, the first text on gynecology used pictures of a blackRead MoreEssay about Reflections on the Analytic/Continental Divide3546 Words   |  15 Pagesmetaphysics, the branch of philosophy concerned to detail what is. (Metaphysics is the phoenix of philosophy: perpetually dying and reappearing.) Logic with its insistence on deductively valid formal rules of inference obscured more gen eral epistemologies as the pre-eminent way in which we come to know anything. Language replaced thought (at least to the extent that there is no other way to talk about thought, and a public language must individuate our thought content). Verification replaced meaningRead MoreIslam and Science2754 Words   |  12 Pageswas retained and naturalized. This was certainly not the case with al-Khwarazmi or Ibn Hayyan whose works were certainly more inï ¬â€šuenced by ideas that were non Islamic, e.g., Greek, Egyptian, Indian, Persian, Babylonian. Equally problematic are unsubstantiated claims that the sciences of early Islam developed a Qur’an methodology that was used by the scientiï ¬ c tradition. The work also adduces examples of theologians (mutakallimun) who worked on ideas that embraced logic, epistemology and cosmology,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.